The baby cage craze never really caught on in New York City in the early 1900s

It probably sounded like a worthy solution at the time, a way for babies living in airless city tenements to get fresh air and sunshine.

Both were absolutely essential to development, according to an influential 1884 childcare book by Luther Emmett Holt, MD. Holt was a pioneering pediatrician and the head of New York City’s first Babies’ Hospital in 1889. In his book, Holt advocated “airing out” infants to “renew and purify the blood.”

“In the crowded sections of the big cities the ‘baby brigade,’ with a nurse girl or mother standing watch over each infant, has long been a familiar sight,” stated one New York newspaper in 1913. “If a baby is to thrive it must, of course, be kept out in the open air and sunshine.”

But as the newspaper also noted, “this has meant that somebody must constantly stand guard to see that no harm befalls” the baby.

Enter the baby cage, invented by Mrs. Robert C. Lafferty from both Baltimore and New York, per the newspaper. It was a cage-like contraption that would stick out of a window like a modern-day air conditioner in which a baby can safely be placed.

The idea was that while baby sat and played and absorbed fresh air and sunlight inside this screened-in box affixed to the window frame, mom could tend to other issues in the home without worrying that her child would be in harm’s way.

The first version of what was termed the “health crib” made its debut in 1913. Made of “willow latticed walls” and covered in mosquito netting to keep out insects, the newspaper noted that “the top is solid to protect the infant from articles that might be dropped through” from apartments on higher floors.

Ten years later, a new version of the health crib was created by a Washington State woman named Emma Read. Her patented “baby cage” had a floor and roof made of sheet metal to keep out the elements. The walls were outfitted with wire “admitting plenty of air and light,” per another New York newspaper, which added this commentary:

“The occupant of the cage cannot possibly fall out, is protected against rain or snow, and enjoys the healthful advantage of unlimited fresh air,” the newspaper noted. “In pleasant weather the child may be kept all day in the outdoor house, eating, sleeping, and amusing itself therein, while under observation from inside the room.”

Did parents stuck in Gotham’s neighborhoods of sunless tenements rush out to buy baby cages? Apparently they were popular in London, but information on and photos of New York City moms and dads putting their kids in them has been hard to come by.

The exception, though, is Eleanor Roosevelt, who reportedly recalled of her years as a young mother that she “knew absolutely nothing about handling or feeding a baby.” She created a baby cage for her daughter Anna in 1906—before the health crib or Read’s baby cage hit the market.

Anna was Eleanor and Franklin D. Roosevelt’s first child (third photo), born when the couple was living in a brownstone at 125 East 36th Street (fourth photo). Knowing the prevailing advice about babies and fresh air thanks to her work at settlement houses, 22-year-old Eleanor “had a wire box attached high above the ground on a side of the house that received no sunlight,” stated author Jan Pottker in her 2005 book, Sara and Eleanor.

Anna was placed in this “jerry-rigged contraption” for a length of time every day as decreed by Eleanor, and the baby subsequently “screamed from the cold and neglect,” wrote Pottker. Finally “a neighbor threatened to call the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.”

At that, Eleanor brought Anna inside and stopped the regular airing.

[Top image: The Keene Sentinal; second image: rarehistoricalphotos.com; third image: Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum; fourth image: Larry Gertner for the Historical Marker Database; fifth image: rarehistoricalphotos.com]

Tags: , , , , ,

18 Responses to “The baby cage craze never really caught on in New York City in the early 1900s”

  1. Penelope Bianchi Says:

    As always, this is absolutely fascinating. It is a wonder what children in the past have survived. Horrific suggestions by doctors and “experts! I am hoping that enough mothers who had true maternal instincts could not survive the crying, and abandoned this monstrous practice. Thank you for this!
    I LOVE your website and your posts!!!

    • ephemeralnewyork Says:

      Thank you! Health advice is always changing and evolving, right? So many of the medical truths we trust today will be viewed very differently in a matter of decades.

  2. surrealartpsychonaut Says:

    Unlimited fresh air yet protected from rain and snow? I’m not sure about that. How many people would leave a baby in a wire cage jutting out from a window when it’s snowing? I had seen photos of baby cages before, but this is the first article about them that I’ve read. Keep the quirky articles coming.

    • ephemeralnewyork Says:

      It’s not often I come across something as bizarre as baby cages, but when I found a solid New York City connection I wanted to post it. Quirky…I’d say crazy.

  3. Larry Gertner Says:

    I see you are using the photo I took of the Roosevelt brownstone for my Historical Marker Database (HMDb) entry on the site. If you’d care to credit it, the photographer is Larry Gertner.

  4. beth Says:

    terrifying

  5. Tom B Says:

    I am surprised that 118 years ago NYC had a Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. Are they still around? The dangerous situations are countless on what we expose our children to today.
    The Baby Cage back then makes sense to me if you couldn’t get to the Parks.

    • ephemeralnewyork Says:

      Yes they are still around, with a very 19th century name that spells out exactly what their mission is.

  6. velovixen Says:

    I don’t know how I feel about “baby cages.” On one hand, it’s good that babies had an al fresco respite from crowded tenements. On the other, I can’t stand to look at any living creature in a cage. (I haven’t been to a zoo in decades.) And the one that looks like an air conditioner is really creepy!

    • ephemeralnewyork Says:

      I’m with you about anything living creature in a cage, and I just don’t see most babies sitting placid and happy while mama and the rest of the family are warm and cozy inside!

  7. seewavesny Says:

    Wow..but it gives me and baby chills!

  8. Michael Leddy Says:

    Babies, cages: yikes, and yikes again.

    But I’m reminded of the practice of leaving babies in carriages while a parent or caregiver went into a store. You can see unattended carriages outside stores in many a WPA tax photo. An unattended carriage is a plot point in at least two movies, Angels with Dirty Faces (1938) and Not Wanted (1949).

    It appears (emphasis: appears) that leaving babies outside and unattended while they nap is still common in Denmark:

    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/danish-babies-nap-alone-outside/

    • VirginiaLB Says:

      I saw this in Brooklyn in the 1950s outside the A&P. My mother was horrified but it was a frequent occurrence.

    • Nikki Says:

      I recall decades ago, a family visiting NYC from somewhere in Scandinavia go into a restaurant for a meal. They left their baby outside in its stroller, and drama ensued. People thought the baby was abandoned, authorities were called, they wanted to press charges. I don’t remember how it ended, all I remember is the outrage.

  9. Alex Says:

    Unlike for a baby, perhaps for a pet dog or a cat that’s not bad.

  10. Shayne Davidson Says:

    Amazing the lengths people used to go to endangering their children!

  11. A vanished Henry Hudson memorial on Riverside Drive, and the sculpture that replaced it | Ephemeral New York Says:

    […] there is a memorial at this circular spot once again: a sculpture of Eleanor Roosevelt. Dedicated in 1996, “this piece depicts Roosevelt in heroic scale half-seated against a […]

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.