A bit of mystery surrounds the origin of innocent-sounding Maiden Lane, one of the first streets laid out by 17th century Dutch colonists.
It may have started as a lovers’ lane.
“Tradition had it that the girls of early Dutch days were wont to stroll by the little stream along what was known first as Maagde Paatje,” says a 1911 New York Times article.
The name might also stem from the street’s rep as New Amsterdam’s clothes-washing center. “Maiden Lane was the site of a freshwater stream where young maidens did their laundry,” explains Gerard R. Wolfe’s New York: A Guide to the Metropolis.
Whether a lovers path or laundry area, Maiden Lane was for a short time home to Thomas Jefferson.
The street eventually hosted a market and then became the city’s jewelry district in the 19th century.
It’s part of the Financial District now, but the name resonates differently than, say, adjacent Gold Street.
“View of South Street, From Maiden Lane,” by William James Bennett, 1827
Tags: Dutch Colonial New York City, From Maiden Lane, lovers lanes in New York City, Maagde Paatje, Maiden Lane, New Amsterdam, New York in the 17th century, New York in the 1820s, underground streams in Manhattan, Viele Map, View of South Street, William James Bennett
April 9, 2010 at 10:15 am |
All this sounds like wishful thinking to me. Maiden Lane looks like a clear euphemism for what trade actually is likely to have been conducted on what was essentially a peripheral, narrow, damp street in colonial times.
May 13, 2010 at 2:47 am |
Hi,
Nope You are all wrong,I saw a drawing with pictures
of young women “doing the laundry” by the creek called Maiden
Lane.But here is a real mystery for which I would
appreciate help with.For years this underground stream’s trace
was very obvious and difficult to deal with.This stream invaded
foundations of the surrounding buildings and the resulting water
was pumped to a sewer line(s) located above it (40-50 feet up).
However I noticed its absence at the end of 2009.Maybe the
new WTC construction has finally resolved this problem.
Vincent P (no pun)
April 9, 2010 at 2:00 pm |
I was hoping I’d uncover evidence about that! I think it’s safe to assume that some of the maidens of Maiden Lane may not have just been washing clothes.
April 12, 2010 at 1:26 am |
JOHN street is one block over. Uhmm, hmmmm
April 12, 2010 at 1:47 am |
that proves it…
June 20, 2010 at 10:58 pm |
Henry Moscow’s “The Street Book”, a generally reliable source, agrees with the “young girls doing laundry” theory. Nearby John Street was named after John Harperding or Harperdinck, a wealthy Dutch shoemaker.
November 14, 2013 at 7:26 am |
[…] York has had several Lover’s Lanes: Maiden Lane may have been one in Dutch colonial days; Central Park and Riverside Park also had tree-lined paths designated for […]
July 31, 2017 at 8:07 pm |
“Where maiden Dutch girls washed laundry” in the then-existing stream or a street containing “houses of ill repute”, either one is evocative of a fascinating long-ago New York